And thank you, because this is a very correct and timely addition, and even for continuing the conversation it creates additional volume. Because what conclusion should we draw from what we have already said together?

Yes, there is a special military operation going on in the fields of Ukraine, no one denies it, this is also the case in the whole world, and from a legal point of view, primarily international law, and even from a military point of view, by the way. But our top officials have been talking for quite some time about the fact that we are at war with the United West, led by the Anglo-Saxons. Let's try to characterize this war, it is definitely not a special military operation. And in order to do this, and for a better understanding of the process we are already in, it is important, already, we are not going to, and we are not promised, we are already in it. All wars, let's say, in the era of the new time, interstate wars, they can be divided, there are different ones, I explain to the historian, sorry, they can be divided according to different principles, but one of them, which is important to me now, that is, all wars can be divided into two baskets. In one basket there will be wars called wars for interests. There can be various interests, territorial, demographic,

wars for resources, dynastic, any, but these are wars for some designated interests. By the way, not necessarily selfish, but they are designated. And all these wars, because the interest is designated, they are all finite. That is, it is clear when one side gets what it wants, the war ends, a peace treaty is signed. Until the next war, the war of revenge. Well, like the history of France and Germany in the 19th century.

And in this basket, the overwhelming majority of all wars of the new time are located. And in the other basket there is another war, other wars. These are not wars for interests, these are ideological wars or, let's say, ideological wars. And they can also be called wars for values. And the main war that lies in this basket, well, actually, out of all the wars, probably the only one, is the Great Patriotic War.

Because we fought the Great Patriotic War not for territories, not for resources. We fought for values, we fought for life. And our enemy fought for death. Which is inherent in Nazism in general. It is such a tautological ideology. So, what is the difference between these wars for interests and wars for values? I have already said that negotiations end after the interest is satisfied, they are limited. And the war for values is not limited.

It is a war of annihilation. There can be no other solution, because you cannot negotiate with evil. No one has ever been ready to negotiate with Hitler about the division of territories, powers, interests, and so on. If we are fighting against Nazism, then it is a war of annihilation. And this is very serious. I think that in this context, and in Europe, perhaps, there are no longer enough educated and experienced people to even perceive this.

Well, at least in their elites, this is certainly a catastrophe, a pan-European one. But in the United States there are still people who are ready to hear this, to perceive it and even translate it for their own elites, in quotes, and convey it. In this, in general, context, the words said yesterday by Vladimir Vladimirovich, that we will not send tanks to your borders, we will send something else. Now, within the framework of a war of annihilation, and when our enemy is not localized in Kiev, and we ourselves have not yet fully answered the question of its location.

And let them sit and wait, whom of them we will designate as the very den, in which the sealed vermin should sit. They can compete there. For example, the United States and Scandinavia can compete in terms of Nazism, and I think they will have a draw. So, in fact, in recent days, this is exactly what worries me, because if not worries, but my attention is concentrated on this, because if we understand this framework, then we must look at what is happening on our battlefields in a new way, and more precisely at what causes concern among our people.

And I can name a few examples here. Commerce during war. Some local negotiations on specific issues. All this causes wild irritation among our people. If we are fighting against global Nazism, then it doesn't matter whether a gas pipeline goes through Ukraine or Europe or not. We need resources for war, so let it go. We will earn money and support the economy of our country and the well-being of the people of our country and our military-industrial complex in order to, if not destroy the vermin in its den, then drive it into the den and seal it there with an eternal seal.